Touro University International Essays (583 words) - Nuclear Weapons

Touro University International James L. White ETH 501 Module 5, Session Long Project Dr. Steven J. Gold INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to describe my most dangerous job in my origination and answer the following questions, "Do I fell that employees are adequately informed of the risk?" and, "Do I feel that the risk is acceptable and reasonable?" By discussing these topics I hope to offer some knowledge about my organization high risk job. I will conclude this report with a brief summary of the entire analysis, highlighting some of the most significant parts that the report contains. HIGH RISK In my organization we have a job called Sensitive Duty Program, this program is very essential. This program monitors military personnel performing sensitive duties that could cause severe or grave damage to our nation. This job is so important that not only does the Air Force and U.S. Government rely on us to do the job correctly but so does every citizen in this free country! While what we do is important, the consequences of our actions probably wouldn't be as severe as the actions of someone performing more sensitive duties. So this program helps our national safety and security. It's designed to monitor individuals performing critical duties such as flight crews, security police, missile support personnel, and those working with or around nuclear weapons. There are two parts that fall under the SDP, they are the Personnel Reliability Program (PRP) and the Presidential Support Program (PS). An individual may participate in one or both of these programs. PS program personnel are individuals assigned to duties involving regular or frequent contact with or access to the President of the United States of Presidential facilities, communication activities, or modes of transportation. So these duties could include the Presidential honor guard and band, Presidential aircrew and associated maintenance and security personnel, Presidential mess attendants, Presidential medical personnel, and White House communications and transportation. Minimum criteria for PS program acceptance are: 1) be a US citizen, 2) be of excellent character, 3) have no article 15s on file and 4) if marital status changes, a reassessment verifies that the spouse is a US citizen.. The PRP ensures each person who performs duties with nuclear weapons or critical components meets the highest possible standards of individual reliability. Individual reliability means that the person is stable in carrying out his/her duties associated with nuclear weapons, weapons systems, or critical components. These people could be in a controlled position that requires them to be in close physical proximity to nuclear weapons, weapons systems, or critical components. This person could have access or use the following information: (1) technical data on the electrical or mechanical parts of nuclear weapons or other critical components or (2) have access to unlock/authenticate values of a nuclear weapon or weapons system that launch, release, or detonate the weapon. Because of these people's access to these types of weapons/components, their commanders must ensure their personnel reliability-their trustworthiness to perform duties related to nuclear weapons/critical components. CONCLUSION In today's Air Force you can see that women play a big role in the military mission serving in many vital roles, from pilots to ground troops. History has taught us that we lose out on a lot of good ideas and employees if we discriminate against an individual because of race, gender, religion, etc... WORK CITIED 1. Amazing Women in War and Peace by Retired Captain Barbara A. Wilson, retrieved on 21 August 2006 from http://coelacanth.aug.com/captbarb/ 2. Air Force Pamphlet 36-2241 Volume 1, retrieved 25 August 2006 3. Retrieved 21 August 2006 from http://www.mspb.gov/

A Case for Technical Grammar Skills

A Case for Technical Grammar Skills A Case for Technical Grammar Skills A Case for Technical Grammar Skills By Mark Nichol While I was studying English in college (I later opted for a more practical course of study, and graduated with a degree in theater arts), one of the classes I took dealt with grammar. The professor’s pedagogical approach? Pass out mimeographed copies of his manuscript for a grammar textbook do you care to carbon-date the year I took this class? and spend most of each session plodding through a few pages, asking students to identify the part of speech of each word not in occasional exercises, because there weren’t any, but in the instructional text itself. This was a monumentally boring exercise for me (I never polled classmates about their opinion), and the rote teaching strategy was somewhat surprising, too, because the instructor was an engaging fellow who was also a leading actor with a prominent regional theater company. On reflection, though, it might seem the ideal approach to someone accustomed to painstakingly memorizing lines in preparation for essaying a role. (For me, who later spent considerable time doing the same, it had a perverse logic to it.) It didn’t work for me, though. I passed the class, but with only a tenuous grasp of grammar, and years later, well along in my editorial career, I was still shaky on the difference between adjectives and adverbs. Does that really matter? Is a command of parts of speech essential for writers and editors? Yes, and no. Some DailyWritingTips.com visitors praise me for writing posts about grammar. Others castigate me for boring them with the same entries. By the same token, my professor’s thespian approach to learning must have seemed ideal to some of my classmates, even as I sat there glumly disengaged, getting some parts of speech right but, as I recall, missing more than I hit. So, even though I have relied throughout my career on a more holistic approach to shaping or reshaping my prose and that of others, trusting my instincts to know whether something reads well or requires (or is at least improved by) revision, I have also acquired a great deal of technical knowledge about grammar, and have benefited from this store of lore. Another issue in the variety of responses to my posts about technical matters is that some site visitors are more experienced than others; a recent critic identified himself as a former instructor of college-level English. But for every retired academician, many readers are budding writers, would-be editors, and those for whom English is not their first language. With this disparity in mind, I try to not only cover a wide variety of topics (grammar, usage, style, technique, careers, etc.) but also discuss subjects with varying degrees of complexity. In other words, I try to please some of the people some of the time, which I think is the best I can do. And the tip for the day? Even though I do not remember my grammar class fondly, I do think it had a latent effect on my desire to understand the mechanics of language, which I had never considered before (except in isolation, when completing a worksheet in a precollegiate English class). So, even if you think of yourself as a holistic learner, rather than a technically inclined one, know your grammar vocabulary (like the difference between a dangling modifier and a misplaced modifier), and endeavor to visualize sentences as machines whose components can usually be arranged in more than way but are often discovered, in one’s writing or reading experiences, broken and awaiting repair (or doomed, on the printed page, to a perpetual state of disarray). Rely on your Zen approach to crafting or reshaping prose if it works for you, but know your tools as well. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Grammar category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:What is the Difference Between "These" and "Those"?Cannot or Can Not?Sit vs. Set

Biology and Society Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Biology and Society - Essay Example When the population of a less developed country increases, government faces the pressure of increased demand while the supply of services and facilities is limited owing to the limited budget of the country. In less developed countries, the infrastructure is poor and weak. The population of poor people with a substandard lifestyle is high. People are not much educated. Still, there is abundance of talent while the job opportunities are limited. All these factors encourage people to adopt unique ways of surviving through the hard times. Many people start informal small businesses of their own. A substantial population of people in the less developed countries renders services to foreign countries. Although the population is high, yet the pressure on the government is alleviated as hundreds of thousands of people from these less developed countries migrate to the advanced countries in search of better opportunities of education and employment and have a high standard of living in gener al. Many people from such less developed countries as India, Pakistan, and China migrate to the US, the UK, and such other developed countries every year. So the pressure of increased population is essentially shared by the advanced countries. ... Even though they are advanced economies, and have abundance of means and resources, yet there is not a substantial difference between how things are done in the less developed countries and how they are done in the advanced countries. Although there is considerable expenditure on research and development in the advanced countries, yet most of the projects are in their initial stages and are not developed enough to replace the old ways of doing things. Let’s take the hydrogen cars for example. Hydrogen car operates differently from the fuel-operated cars in that it does not use gasoline and accordingly does not cause air pollution like the fuel-operated cars do. Hydrogen cars produce steam while fuel-operated cars produce exhaust. Clearly, hydrogen cars are more environment friendly as compared to the fuel-operated cars. However, a vast majority of people even in the advanced countries drive the fuel-operated cars. Hydrogen cars are used by a minority of people since they are v ery expensive and are not produced in large numbers. As it is said, â€Å"The car of the future [the hydrogen car] is here today. Of course, you can't buy one yet† (Lampton). The bigger contributor to the reduction of environmental health and safety is growing consumption of natural resources by the advanced countries. The more the resources are consumed, the more the pollution is created. Whether it is air pollution, water pollution, noise pollution, or any kind of pollution, it is more where there is more development. In fact, the very development with the use of the natural resources is what makes the advanced economies advanced. â€Å"Even the availability of grain is affected more by rising livestock numbers and the use of biofuels – driven, again by consumption – than by human